Bug 693032

Summary: [KMS] 2.6.38.2-10 breaks acceleration
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Hans de Goede <hdegoede>
Component: xorg-x11-drv-nouveauAssignee: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 15CC: airlied, ajax, bskeggs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-04-04 01:30:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Xorg.log of Xorg start with 2.6.38.2-10, without accel
none
lspci output on the machine in question none

Description Hans de Goede 2011-04-02 06:29:41 UTC
Created attachment 489545 [details]
Xorg.log of Xorg start with 2.6.38.2-10, without accel

Hi,

You may already know this, but I'm reporting it just to be sure, I noticed kernel 2.6.38.2-10 in koji and that it contained several nouveau fixes, so I gave it a spin.

Unfortunately it seems to be breaking acceleration in my case, see the attached Xorg.log, esp. :
[    21.250] (EE) NOUVEAU(0): Error creating GPU channel: -16

This is on a Dell E6400 laptop with NVIDIA graphics. I'll also attach lspci output.

Regards,

Hans

p.s.

Great job on nouveau, I used to use the nvidia binary driver with F-14, because of suspend resume not working with nouveau before (something which I must admit I neglected to report) amongst other reasons,
but with F-15 after the rebase to the 7.11 mesa snapshot nouveau is working very well for me!

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2011-04-02 06:30:38 UTC
Created attachment 489546 [details]
lspci output on the machine in question

Comment 2 Ben Skeggs 2011-04-04 01:19:32 UTC
Can you post me a dmesg log after a failed start of X with accel?

Comment 3 Ben Skeggs 2011-04-04 01:30:53 UTC
Actually, nevermind.  I think I know what's going on, this'd be a duplicate of 692858.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 692858 ***