| Summary: | [abrt] openoffice.org-brand-1:3.3.0-20.2.fc14: SfxShell::SetDisableFlags: Process /usr/lib/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | info <info> | ||||
| Component: | openoffice.org | Assignee: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | caolanm | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:90d4baf2cc9e55905ea71c9294fa2f2417f08900 | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-04-17 22:14:26 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
info@kobaltwit.be
2011-04-02 09:58:55 UTC
Created attachment 489567 [details]
File: backtrace
Package: openoffice.org-brand-1:3.3.0-20.2.fc14 Architecture: i686 OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) How to reproduce ----- See bug 693065 Please ignore comment 2. It is the result of my attempt to attach a second backtrace via abrt. But abrt apparently considered the second backtrace a duplicate of the original one, so it just added comment 2 and not the backtrace. I tried to reproduce this with some simple examples with no success. Its clearly a crash on closing of the documents, but its not obvious from the backtrace where exactly the error lies. It might help if we could get your template, and/or some indication of what class of item got tweaked in the original. #0
pImp->nDisableFlags = nFlags: so we can assume that "this" is busted completely
#1
void SfxDispatcher::SetDisableFlags( sal_uInt32 nFlags )
{
pImp->nDisableFlags = nFlags;
for ( int i = int(pImp->aStack.Count()) - 1; i >= 0; --i )
pImp->aStack.Top( (sal_uInt16) i )->SetDisableFlags( nFlags );
}
much less clear, i apparently is 0, which suggests that the stack contains a wrong value from elsewhere so from the stack trace alone I can't determine the problem, and I can't reproduce the problem with a simple test-case :-(
If you can provide a test-case which triggers this feel free to reopen this and attach the data.
|