Bug 69337
Summary: | up2date traceback when using proxy | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael> |
Component: | up2date | Assignee: | Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibanescu> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | limbo | CC: | leenookx |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-07-24 04:18:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 67217, 68104 |
Description
Michael Schwendt
2002-07-21 15:50:55 UTC
Changing component to rhn_register, where the bug originally was, and was fixed a couple of days ago. A couple of days ago? Is rhnlib-0.8-8.noarch.rpm supposed to fix it? If so, it doesn't. Or is an updated rhn_register package available anywhere? The bug is not in rhnlib, it's in rhn_register Check out ftp://people.redhat.com/misa/fixes, there should be a newer up2date there as well now. No rhn_register there. Sorry for bugging you. ;) # rpm -q up2date up2date-2.9.16-7.x.9 # rpm -q rhn_register package rhn_register is not installed * Thu Jul 18 2002 Adrian Likins <alikins> - obsolete rhn_register * Wed Jul 17 2002 Adrian Likins <alikins> - merge in rhn_register But: # up2date Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 801, in ? main() File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 579, in main from up2date_client import gui File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/gui.py", line 46, in ? import rhnreg ImportError: No module named rhnreg ** (up2date:1061): WARNING **: CORBA_ORB_destroy: ORB still has 2 refs. > File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/gui.py", line 46, in ?
> import rhnreg
doh, fixed. 2.9.17 should fixed it. should be on misa's link
shortly
# rpm -e up2date up2date-gnome # rm -rf /etc/sysconfig/rhn # rpm -i up2date*2.9.17-7.x.9* # rpm -q rhnlib rhnlib-0.8-8 # rpm -q up2date up2date-gnome up2date-2.9.17-7.x.9 up2date-gnome-2.9.17-7.x.9 # up2date-config [change to use Proxy server] /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date reads: enableProxy=1 httpProxy=host.domain:3128 # up2date Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 17, in ? from up2date_client import rpcServer File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpcServer.py", line 7, in ? import up2dateAuth File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/up2dateAuth.py", line 4, in ? import rpmSource File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpmSource.py", line 113, in ? psc = PackageSourceConfig() File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpmSource.py", line 83, in __init__ self.serverSettings = ServerSettings() File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpmSource.py", line 62, in __init__ if cfg.readEntry("enableProxy") and rpcServer.getProxySetting(): AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'getProxySetting' I had a bit of trouble installing these updates. I removed up2date and up2date-gnome from my machine using 'rpm -e up2date up2date-gnome'. Then tried to install the newer version of up2date, and I got the following error: [root@deepthought richard]# rpm -Uvh up2date-2.9.17-7.x.9.i386.rpm error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - No such file or directory (2) error: Failed dependencies: rhn_register = 2.9.6 is needed by rhn_register-gnome-2.9.6-7.x.9 Which seems a bit odd to me. The error seems to be because of a manual entry in the RPM... [root@deepthought richard]# rpm -i up2date*2.9.17-7.x.9* file /usr/sbin/rhnreg_ks from install of up2date-2.9.17-7.x.9 conflicts with file from package rhn_register-2.9.6-7.x.9 file /usr/share/man/man8/rhnreg_ks.8.gz from install of up2date-2.9.17-7.x.9 conflicts with file from package rhn_register-2.9.6-7.x.9 However, when I did: 'rpm -Uvh up2date*2.9.17-7.x.9*' it all installed properly - or at least I didn't get any warnings. Do both of these packages provide this same man entry? @ leenookx : When upgrading packages, always upgrade all packages at once with -Uvh or -Fvh, respectively. [...] Anyway, just for the record, traceback from 2002-07-22 18:55:54 is also with: # rpm -q rhnlib rhnlib-0.8-9 # rpm -qa | grep ^up2date up2date-gnome-2.9.20-7.x.9 up2date-2.9.20-7.x.9 The traceback comes also when running "up2date-config" after up2date has been configured for proxy usage: # up2date-config Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/up2date-config", line 17, in ? from up2date_client import rpcServer File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpcServer.py", line 7, in ? import up2dateAuth File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/up2dateAuth.py", line 4, in ? import rpmSource File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpmSource.py", line 113, in ? psc = PackageSourceConfig() File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpmSource.py", line 83, in __init__ self.serverSettings = ServerSettings() File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rpmSource.py", line 62, in __init__ if cfg.readEntry("enableProxy") and rpcServer.getProxySetting(): AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'getProxySetting' [...] Changing component to "up2date" since rhn_register has been integrated. This bug is now the same as bug 68437 . *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 68437 *** |