Bug 693513

Summary:	deleting template should clean up associated /var/lib/iwhd/image
Product:	[Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine	Reporter:	Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Component:	aeolus-conductor	Assignee:	Jason Guiditta <jguiditt>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Brad P. Crochet <brad>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	1.0.0	CC:	deltacloud-maint, jrd, morazi, whayutin
Target Milestone:	alpha
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-05-15 21:41:36 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Dave Johnson 2011-04-04 20:56:47 UTC

Description of problem:
I noticed that when I delete a template, the action fails to clean up the built template contained in the warehouse.  We probably need to clean these up to because we run the risk of filling up the file system with orphaned data.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@dell-pe1950-01 log]# rpm -qa | grep aeolus
aeolus-configure-2.0.0-5.fc14.20110401173241git4d62feb.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.0.3-0.fc14.20110401225256git6800ed8.x86_64
aeolus-conductor-0.0.3-0.fc14.20110401225256git6800ed8.x86_64
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.0.3-0.fc14.20110401225256git6800ed8.x86_64

Comment 1 jrd 2011-04-05 01:02:15 UTC

We should think through the implications of this.

What if the image is currently running in some backend?

What if the template was generated from kalpana?

What if there are multiple people using the UI, and somebody else has it open?

I'm not saying we shouldn't clean up images, or even that we shouldn't delete templates.  But we should think through the implications of these kinds of operations.

Comment 2 Jason Guiditta 2011-09-19 20:19:46 UTC

As there is no UI around templates in the conductor any more, is this even still a valid BZ?

Comment 3 wes hayutin 2011-09-20 12:59:19 UTC

Dave, can you retest this just using the aeolus-image command.
Thanks

Comment 4 wes hayutin 2011-09-28 16:38:00 UTC

making sure all the bugs are at the right version for future queries

Comment 6 Jason Guiditta 2011-10-11 17:46:24 UTC

please see my question from september, otherwise, lets just close this out

Comment 8 Dave Johnson 2012-02-03 14:59:51 UTC

This one is good to go now with both aeolus-image command as well as the ui built around component outlines using

aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-19.el6.noarch

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2012-05-15 21:41:36 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0583.html