Bug 693788

Summary: bind97 doesn't contain root zone DNSKEY
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Steve Snyder <swsnyder>
Component: bind97Assignee: Adam Tkac <atkac>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 5.6CC: azelinka, ovasik
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-08 04:05:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 695382    

Description Steve Snyder 2011-04-05 15:11:52 UTC
Description of problem:

The current package of bind97 contains file "named.iscdlv.key" which is out-dated, and doesn't reflect the keys of the root zone.  This file should be replaced with this one:

http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/keys/9.7/bind.keys.v9_7

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

bind97-9.7.0-6.P2.el5

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use current bind97 package in DNSSEC configuration
2. Note complaints in the BIND logs about the root zone being unsigned
  
Actual results:

Lots of log entries with this format:

dnssec: validating @0x9a3f280: . NSEC: no valid signature found
dnssec: validating @0x9a3f280: . SOA: no valid signature found

Expected results:

BIND package should be able to correct validate the root zone.

Additional info:

http://www.isc.org/community/blog/201007/using-root-dnssec-key-bind-9-resolvers

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2013-01-08 04:05:33 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0043.html