Bug 693814

Summary: tuned profiles for virtual guests
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Marko Myllynen <myllynen>
Component: tunedAssignee: Jan Vcelak <jvcelak>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: ddumas, djuran, sradvan, tsmetana
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-28 00:00:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Marko Myllynen 2011-04-05 16:03:45 UTC
Description of problem:
It might be useful to have tuned profiles for virtual guests with different tunings for volume / file based storage, power savings, and other such settings which are typically different on physical and virtual machines.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tuned-0.2.11

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-05 16:23:58 UTC
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 01:36:45 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 4 Scott Radvan 2012-02-28 00:00:07 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 740977 ***