| Summary: | Boot failure due to future mount timestamp -- fsck does not work everytime | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Yogesh Babar <ybabar> |
| Component: | e2fsprogs | Assignee: | Eric Sandeen <esandeen> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | cww, sct |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-23 18:58:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Yogesh Babar
2011-04-05 20:41:04 UTC
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as exception or blocker. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Some of this is expected, but there are patches upstream to relax the clock vs. timestamp requirements. These could be added so that less severe clock differences don't cause a forced fsck. Actually, all of these upstream commits are in place in the RHEL6 e2fsprogs package.
It is by design that e2fsck -p won't work when the time looks "insane," and a manual fsck is requested.
If this is what you see, it is actually working as intended.
There is also an option, "broken_system_clock" :
from RELEASE-NOTES:
> E2fsck now will completely skip time-based checks if the system clock
> looks insane or the option broken_system_clock is set in
> /etc/e2fsck.conf.
so this behavior can be changed.
I'm going to close this NOTABUG, but feel free to re-open if you feel that this is incorrect, with more detail or rationale...
Thanks,
-Eric
|