Bug 694798

Summary: Multiple dhclients can steal each others' DHCPOFFERs
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jiri Popelka <jpopelka>
Component: dhcpAssignee: Jiri Popelka <jpopelka>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.1CC: atodorov, mganisin, msvoboda, ovasik, simone
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: dhcp-4.1.1-20.P1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, when multiple DHCP clients were launched at the same time to handle multiple virtual interfaces on the same network interface card (NIC), the clients used the same seed to choose when to renew their leases. Consequently, these virtual interfaces for some clients could have been removed over time. With this update, the dhclient utility uses the Process Identifier (PID) for seeding the random number generator, which fixes the bug.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 623953 Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 12:00:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 623953    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 4 Miroslav Svoboda 2011-08-30 10:55:40 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Previously, when multiple DHCP clients were launched at the same time to handle multiple virtual interfaces on the same network interface card (NIC), the clients used the same seed to choose when to renew their leases. Consequently, these virtual interfaces for some clients could have been removed over time. With this update, the dhclient utility uses the Process Identifier (PID) for seeding the random number generator, which fixes the bug.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 12:00:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1597.html