Bug 695060
Summary: | RFE: file copy paste support | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | juzhang <juzhang> |
Component: | spice-vdagent | Assignee: | Zeeshan Ali <zeenix> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | acathrow, alevy, bcao, dblechte, hdegoede, marcandre.lureau, mclasen, michen, zeenix |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-07-23 08:44:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 840699 |
Description
juzhang
2011-04-10 09:38:32 UTC
was no approved for 6.3 -> 6.4? This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4. We've made several designs for file copy&paste support for the agent, and all were rejected on technical grounds. Using copy and paste, simply is not the right answer for file sharing between guest and client. We are looking into other solutions using a network filesystem to share directories (and their sub directories) between client and guest. Alon asked on irc for some more info on this, so here we go: The problem is that with file-copy-paste the amount of data can become quite large, so you must pre-send it to the guest/client, otherwise the app doing the paste will timeout. Normal (local) file copy-paste only gives a list of file-locationss to the other side, so you must first store them somewhere on the guest, with the risk of running out of disk space, etc. So Simply always announcing we've "files" in the clipboard won't work, we could always pre-cache before doing so, but that would cost enormous amounts of bandwidth, so then it becomes a question of adding a menu to the client to actually send files to the guest, with a progress bar. When you've done that, you can still run out of diskspace on the guest, and even if you don't then the guest filemanager will copy them from the tmp location to their final destination, with another progress bar, and on that second copy you can again run out of diskspace, etc... So all in all it just does not add up to a pleasant user experience. |