Bug 695145
| Summary: | missing favicon generates errors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mohammed Arafa <bugzilla> |
| Component: | httpd | Assignee: | Joe Orton <jorton> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | jorton, pahan |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-04-11 08:22:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Mohammed Arafa
2011-04-10 22:10:26 UTC
Thanks for contacting us. This is a "good" error message - it reminds you to install a favicon! a) if we provided a default, some people might well not notice they need to install a favicon, and would hence stick with the default b) the whole point of favicons is that they are intended to be unique per site or organisation - a "default" would default that point since it would be used inevitably across multiple unrelated sites c) what icon could we use? Nothing any better than what web browers themselves display as a fallback. We couldn't for example use Fedora or Apache branding - we wouldn't want to associate those brands with whatever content users want to host. There used to be some Netscape web server which did exactly this, and for a good while you could go to some big web sites (some US banks or US government particularly IIRC) and see the little Netscape "N" favicon. It reflected badly on those sites, to be honest; it would have been better to have no favicon. So, thanks a lot for the suggestion, but we won't be implementing this :) |