Bug 695280

Summary: Installer unable to find correct dvd from nfsiso repository containing a set of images
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Documentation Reporter: He Rui <rhe>
Component: install-guideAssignee: Petr Bokoc <pbokoc>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Ruediger Landmann <rlandman+disabled>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: develCC: anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, jonathan, pbokoc, rlandman, vanmeeuwen+fedora, zach
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: RejectedBlocker
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 749424 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-07-31 14:33:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 749424    
Attachments:
Description Flags
screen.png
none
anaconda.log
none
mount info none

Description He Rui 2011-04-11 10:05:12 UTC
Description of problem:
Direct anaconda to install packages from nfs repository of iso images(contain several boot.isos, live cds and dvds) by either repo=nfsiso: or askmethod. Before package selection step, installer claimed it cann't find the install image. The anaconda.log also shows that it didn't recognize the correct dvd.iso among the images.    

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda 15.27
F15 beta rc2

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
0. Prepare nfs repository with a set of isos
1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceNfsIso

Actual results:
Unable to find and mount the correct iso

Additional info:
This method went smooth if there's only one expected iso in the nfs server.

Comment 1 He Rui 2011-04-11 10:06:04 UTC
Created attachment 491190 [details]
screen.png

Comment 2 He Rui 2011-04-11 10:06:36 UTC
Created attachment 491191 [details]
anaconda.log

Comment 3 He Rui 2011-04-11 10:07:21 UTC
Created attachment 491192 [details]
mount info

Comment 4 He Rui 2011-04-11 10:09:44 UTC
Proposed as F15Blocker.

Comment 5 Chris Lumens 2011-04-11 14:51:00 UTC
It has always been our recommendation that you only have the correct ISOs in the directory you point anaconda to.  I believe the test case and documentation should be updated to reflect that.

Comment 6 Adam Williamson 2011-04-15 19:11:44 UTC
Discussed at 2011-04-15 blocker review meeting. As this does not mean the install method in question is actually non-functional, rejected as a blocker.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 7 Jack Reed 2011-10-27 06:14:26 UTC
For F16 version of the guide, I've added an Important admonition after the first step in both the NFS and HD installation preparation procedures, explaining that the specified directory must only contain the ISO image file being used for this installation.

The drafts can be found at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Installation_Guide/ch-Preparing-x86.html#s1-steps-network-installs-x86 and http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Installation_Guide/s1-steps-hd-installs-x86.html

Cheers,

Jack

Comment 8 Brian Lane 2011-10-27 14:01:10 UTC
You can now specify the specific .iso file (bug 707846) in a directory.

Comment 9 Jack Reed 2011-11-03 06:22:14 UTC
Thanks, Brian. So can you confirm that this renders the new admonition moot? Is the user now prompted to select the iso within the directory?

I'll remove the admonition if so.

Comment 10 Brian Lane 2011-11-03 16:22:05 UTC
No, if they want to use a specific .iso then the user needs to specify the full path and filename to the iso instead of just the directory containing it. If they don't specify the full path then the previous behavior of only 1 iso per directory is correct.

Comment 11 Jack Reed 2011-11-04 00:11:36 UTC
Thanks Brian. Because the command example given in step 1 specifies that the ISO filename should be included, this new functionality now falls into line with it, so I'll remove the admonition to avoid confusion.

Comment 12 Karsten Wade 2011-12-14 03:45:32 UTC
Removing myself for these bug components as I'm either no longer involved in that aspect of the project, or no longer care to watch this particular bug. Sorry if you are caught in a maelstrom of bug changes as a result!