Bug 695390

Summary:	Resilient Storage Add On should include all packages in High Availability Add On
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Perry Myers <pmyers>
Component:	releng	Assignee:	Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Release Test Team <release-test-team>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.0	CC:	atodorov, cluster-maint, dmach, jstodola
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 12:57:59 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Perry Myers 2011-04-11 15:06:32 UTC

Description of problem:
RS Add On is a superset of the HA Add On.  There are two ways to handle this:
1) Make users set up both RHN channels when they set up a system
2) Make sure that all HA packages are included in the RS channel

The latter is easier and there are no downsides to duplicating the packages in both channels.

So this bug is to simply add the following groups to the RS Add On:

ha
ha-management

This should make sure all of the appropriate packages from the HA Add On get pulled into the RS Add On

Comment 2 Dennis Gregorovic 2011-04-13 13:45:49 UTC

change checked into comps and will appear in the next compose.

Comment 4 Alexander Todorov 2011-04-19 08:37:51 UTC

In snap #4 ha and ha-management groups are added in comps.xml for ResilientStorage. All packages from HA are also included in RS. Moving to VERIFIED.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 12:57:59 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0540.html