Bug 696169

Summary:	The GUI shows version "none" for all resources
Product:	[Other] RHQ Project	Reporter:	Lukas Krejci <lkrejci>
Component:	Core UI	Assignee:	Ian Springer <ian.springer>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Corey Welton <cwelton>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	4.0.0	CC:	ccrouch, hrupp, ian.springer, mfoley
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-24 01:08:24 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	585306

Description Lukas Krejci 2011-04-13 13:21:47 UTC

Description of problem:

On the resource details page, the version field always shows "none" regardless of what actually present in the database.

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. inventory a linux platform
2. look at the resource details, exand the triangle icon to see the traits
  
Actual results:
version is "none"

Expected results:
the platform plugin reports the version correctly and it is stored correctly in the database. The version should therefore be shown in the GUI.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Ian Springer 2011-04-14 21:20:08 UTC

[master 1bbe263] fixes this. 

There was a similar issue with the Location field, which is also fixed by the same commit.

Comment 2 Ian Springer 2011-04-18 18:48:41 UTC

Note, there was a related issue where the Name, Location, and Description fields in the summary area would render as "&nbsp;" if their values were null. I think Jay's change to SimpleEditableFormItem as part of [master 1b76728] should have fixed that issue.

Comment 3 Mike Foley 2011-04-18 19:40:57 UTC

i am not seeing this fix in the 4/18 build.  For a Linux platform resource, I see:

version=none  ...unexpected.
location=&nbsp;   ... unexpected.
description field ... Linux Operating System.

Discussed with Ian.  Can you take one more look at this Ian?  The version displaying as "none" was unexpected.

Comment 4 Ian Springer 2011-04-21 20:48:12 UTC

Here's what I see for my platform:

Version: Linux 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64
Location:
Description: Linux Operating System

Mike, can you please give it another try with a recent build?

Comment 5 Mike Foley 2011-04-21 20:58:47 UTC

Version :	
Linux 2.6.35.12-88.fc14.x86_64

Verified on RHQ 4.0 CR1

Comment 6 Corey Welton 2011-05-24 01:08:24 UTC

Bookkeeping - closing bug - fixed in recent release.