Bug 697137

Summary:	package for epel
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Hushan Jia <hjia>
Component:	python-flask	Assignee:	Dan Young <dyoung>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	15	CC:	dyoung
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-04-24 02:37:59 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Hushan Jia 2011-04-16 02:31:47 UTC

Description of problem:

Hi, its good to use flask in rhel installs, so will you package it for epel? if not, I would like to package it for epel, thanks.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Dan Young 2011-04-18 17:21:21 UTC

I've requested an EL6 branch for python-flask here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613

I'll probably do a python26-flask for EL5 as well, (needs Python 2.5+, so can't use stock EL5 Python).

Are you interested in co-maintaining? Thanks,

Comment 2 Hushan Jia 2011-04-20 12:41:29 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> I've requested an EL6 branch for python-flask here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613
> 
> I'll probably do a python26-flask for EL5 as well, (needs Python 2.5+, so can't
> use stock EL5 Python).
> 
> Are you interested in co-maintaining? Thanks,

Hi Dan,
I am interested in co-maintaining, thanks.

Comment 3 Hushan Jia 2011-04-20 12:50:23 UTC

Hi Dan,
I have submit co-maintaining request in pkgdb, please approve.
Thanks,
Hushan

Comment 4 Dan Young 2011-04-21 21:32:35 UTC

Approved you in pkgdb.

Minor problem: the python-jinja2 dependency is not in EPEL6. I missed this because it is built for EPEL5 and made a bad assumption. Will ask the Fedora and EPEL package maintainers (they are different) if either is interested in maintaining an EL6 branch.

Comment 5 Dan Young 2011-04-22 15:27:03 UTC

As I'm sure you've seen now, Flask will not build in EPEL6 as it stands.

python-jinja2 is in RHEL with version 2.2 (that's why it's not in EPEL6). Flask requires Jinja 2.4 or newer. 

Unless you have any ideas here, I'll probably need to rescind my EL6 branch. :-( Sorry for all the noise here.

Comment 6 Hushan Jia 2011-04-24 02:37:59 UTC

Yes, so the problem is python-jinja2 is already in RHEL6, with version 2.2.1, which prevents build flask into epel6.
Thanks Dan, closing this.