| Summary: | gdk-pixbuf2 compiled without png support | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fred <fred> |
| Component: | gdk-pixbuf2 | Assignee: | Matthias Clasen <mclasen> |
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 15 | CC: | mclasen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-04-25 16:02:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Fred
2011-04-16 17:14:09 UTC
Your problem may be real, but your analysis is wrong: $ ldd /usr/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.2300.3 | grep png libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libpng12.so.0 (0x00000039ddc00000) Hi! Analysis was provided by the kind people on the #gimp channel. What extra data would you need? Or are you just saying that gdk-pixbuf2 has png support. If so how can I test that? Thanks a lot. do what I did: ldd /usr/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.2300.3 | grep png that shows whether gdk-pixbuf is linked against libpng then maybe gvfs-info <your alleged png file> to see what gvfs thinks its mime type is thanks for the help. I did that (I'm using 32bit) and got confirmation on #gnome-shell support was enabled. I'll continue exploring elsewhere then. Thank you very much. |