Bug 697483

I'll do the review.

It's probably too much to ask but django-celery has a dependency on python-celery and that and a couple of its dependencies are still in the review queue.  Reviewing and approving those first is helpful.

I'll take a look on it.

Any updates?

As you already saw, python-celery blocks this and has some depending packages; their review process currently stalled.

python-celery has been approved. I'll take over this review. I have some time on my hands :)

+ OK
- NA
? ISSUE

+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
+ License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
+ Sources match upstream md5sum:
[ankur@ankur SOURCES]$ md5sum ../SPECS/django-celery-2.2.4.tar.gz django-celery-2.2.4.tar.gz 
08ea1ce14af8a09c8eeae7fcfcaefaae  ../SPECS/django-celery-2.2.4.tar.gz
08ea1ce14af8a09c8eeae7fcfcaefaae  django-celery-2.2.4.tar.gz

- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
+ Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.

- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
+ No rpmlint output.
[ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
django-celery.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end
django-celery.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autodiscovery -> auto discovery, auto-discovery, discovery
django-celery.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary djcelerymon
django-celery.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end
django-celery.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autodiscovery -> auto discovery, auto-discovery, discovery
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

^^ 
Please make the spelling corrections. Not a blocker, obviously. 

- final provides and requires are sane:
[ankur@ankur result]$ review-req-check 
== django-celery-2.2.4-1.fc16.noarch.rpm ==
Provides:
django-celery = 2.2.4-1.fc16

Requires:
/usr/bin/python  
Django  
python(abi) = 2.7
python-celery  

== django-celery-2.2.4-1.fc16.src.rpm ==
Provides:

Requires:
python-setuptools-devel  
python-devel  

SHOULD Items:

+ Should build in mock.
+ Should build on all supported archs
+ Should function as described.
+ Should have sane scriptlets.
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
+ Should have dist tag
+ Should package latest version
- check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)

Issues:

1. Just the spelling issues.  The rest is clean.
2. I generally use ?.?.egginfo in the file section. It's just a matter of taste.

Thanks for the quick review

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: django-celery
Short Description: 
Owners: sundaram pjp
Branches: f15 el6
InitialCC: Django Celery Integration

Git done (by process-git-requests).


Moved description to proper field.