Bug 698076

Summary: [abrt] java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.6.0.0-52.1.9.7.fc14: os::die: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: pradeep <pradeepmca30>
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdkAssignee: Deepak Bhole <dbhole>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: ahughes, dbhole, jvanek, lkundrak, mjw, mmatejov, omajid
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:9c44f5ff9bfa021059843b5ba6fa8deb83400644
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-20 16:07:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description pradeep 2011-04-20 06:04:55 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace, 44482 bytes
cmdline: java -classpath lti-civil-no_s_w_t.jar -Djava.library.path=native/linux-amd64 com.lti.civil.swing.CaptureFrame
component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Attached file: coredump, 119517184 bytes
crash_function: os::die
executable: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/bin/java
kernel: 2.6.35.12-88.fc14.x86_64
package: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.6.0.0-52.1.9.7.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1303279449
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.run LTI-CIVIL
2.run sh file from command line type- sh capturecontrol-linux-amd64.sh
3.some part of whole project run 
then showing cashing of jdk version ... and show error.
after it any part of project is not run.
Comment 1 pradeep 2011-04-20 06:05:00 UTC 
Created attachment 493363 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Deepak Bhole 2011-04-20 13:34:46 UTC 
Is this error consistently reproducible?
Comment 3 Deepak Bhole 2011-04-20 13:38:22 UTC 
*** Bug 698128 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 abrt-bot 2012-03-20 16:07:13 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #730195, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: 
  dbus: bug #684589
  java-1.6.0-openjdk: bug #548743, bug #650789, bug #713305, bug #730195

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 730195 ***