| Summary: | system-config-kickstart ignores yum's repo config | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | i.goyret |
| Component: | system-config-kickstart | Assignee: | Chris Lumens <clumens> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | clumens, i.goyret |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-04-22 19:13:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
i.goyret
2011-04-22 01:06:52 UTC
The only way to guarantee that you have the standard package set available - which is basically required for an installation - is to force you to have the standard repos available. You're in a bit of a corner case so continue to use your patch, but I'm not going to make changes for just a corner case. I understand what you say, but all I need is a command line option that disables that odd behavior of ignoring yum's configuration and accept the configured repos. If the user knows those repos are good (which, btw, are also known to be used for new installations), there is no real reason to stop him from using them. Besides, by ignoring yum's configuration, you are making this tool so much harder and slower to use (not everyone has gigabit connectivity to the standard repos). All I ask is for a command line option that disables this undesirable behavior. What I do know is that this is most definitely a bug: ignoring configuration is *always* a bug. More options leads to yet more untested code paths that will themselves have bugs. Considering you are the first person to complain about this problem in the four+ years since s-c-ks starting using yum in this fashion, that only reinforces my understanding that you are describing a corner case. Wow. I didn't know there was an statute of limitations on bugs. I first noticed this problem with FC5. I didn't try any of the intermediate versions until now with F14, which even after 4+ years, STILL SUFFERS FROM THE SAME BASIC BUG! At the very least, you should not call it a "corner case" when you are blatantly ignoring yum's configuration. Ignoring configuration is *ALWAYS* a bug, not a corner case. So please, do not claim this is not a bug because it very much _is_. Changed the state to something closer to reality than the quite incorrect "not a bug" status. |