Bug 699570

Summary: RHEL6.1 WHQL VirtIO signed driver for all components tracker(viostor,vioserial,Balloon)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Qunfang Zhang <qzhang>
Component: virtio-winAssignee: Jay Greguske <jgreguske>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.1CC: afrenkel, dawu, juzhang, llim, michen, mshao, rhod, syeghiay, tburke
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:31:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-26 02:40:46 UTC
Description of problem:
Create this bz for tracking RHEL6.1 signed virtio driver.

Paste the mail from Jay here:

On 04/25/2011 06:00 AM, Qunfang Zhang wrote:
> > Hi, Jay
> > Could you provide a rhel6.1 virtio-win rpm package?
> > As we have not got the signatures for NIC  so could you build
> > a package first with rhel6.1 balloon,serial and blocker driver and
> > rhel6.0 NIC driver?
> > Because we need to do some test before the rpm push out. For example:
> > Installation with iso and vfd, check signatures, basic operation, and so
> > on.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks a lot.
> > Qunfang

Here you go:

https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/taskinfo?taskID=3278327

This is a scratch build though, I don't have any bugzillas to commit
with that match the current check in policy (rel-eng has to obey it
too). If you could send me a bz or two I'll brew a real build.

Thanks,
- Jay



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Qunfang Zhang 2011-04-26 04:57:20 UTC
Hi, Jay
Test with the scratch build you provide, find only win2k8-32 viostorage has no
signature. Other guests are ok.
Could you brew a real build as you said in the mail and include win2k8-32
viostor signature?
The win2k8-32 virtio storage driver has been signed in submission 1449178.

Thanks.


-----------------------------------------------------------
|             | balloon | serial  |  block     |  NIC     |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| win2k3-32   |  pass   |  pass   |  pass      |  pass    |
|---------------------------------------------------------
| win2k3-64   |  pass   |  pass   |  pass      |  pass    |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| win2k8-32   |  pass   |  pass   |No signature|  pass    |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| win2k8-64   |  pass   | pass    |  pass      |  pass    |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| win2k8-R2   |  pass   | pass    |  pass      |  pass    |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| win7-32     |  pass   | pass    |  pass      |  pass    |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| win7-64     |  pass   | pass    |  pass      |  pass    |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| winxp       |  pass   | pass    |  pass      |  pass    |
-----------------------------------------------------------

Comment 2 Jay Greguske 2011-04-27 15:41:54 UTC
Sorry I responded to a different bug. I still can't do a real build until I have a bz with the right flags to commit against. Here's another scratch:

https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/taskinfo?taskID=3280303

Comment 8 Ronen Hod 2011-04-28 16:16:17 UTC
Removed 6.1 netkvm drivers (MS will not pass them with WLK1.5).
We will use the 6.0 netkvm drivers for all the platforms
Thanks, Ronen.

Comment 9 Ronen Hod 2011-04-30 14:07:05 UTC
*** Bug 700456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:31:54 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0782.html