Bug 699652
| Summary: | Document preferred use of TLS_CACERT instead of TLS_CACERTDIR to specify Certificate Authorities | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Ivana Varekova <varekova> |
| Component: | openldap | Assignee: | Jan Vcelak <jvcelak> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ondrej Moriš <omoris> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.5 | CC: | bmason, cww, dspurek, jplans, jvcelak, omoris, ovasik, rvokal, spurrier, tsmetana, varekova |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ManPageChange |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openldap-2.3.43-20.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
The ldap.conf(5) manual page has been modified in order to prefer usage of the TLS_CACERT option instead of the TLS_CACERTDIR option to specify Certificate Authorities.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 649048 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2012-02-21 05:28:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 609722, 649048, 811468 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 590060, 668957, 719046, 731680, 749319 | ||
|
Comment 3
Jan Vcelak
2011-08-18 17:57:17 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
The ldap.conf(5) manual page has been modified in order to prefer usage of the TLS_CACERT option instead of the TLS_CACERTDIR option to specify Certificate Authorities.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0155.html |