Bug 699703

Summary:	RFE : Update qtpfsgui to latest version (renamed Luminance)
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Philip Frampton <philip.frampton>
Component:	qtpfsgui	Assignee:	Douglas E. Warner <silfreed>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	andrei.ilie, rdieter, rom1dep, silfreed
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-03-03 16:49:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Philip Frampton 2011-04-26 12:17:52 UTC

Description of problem:
Current version of qtpfsgui has stayed the same version since 2009 although the actual programme has continued to evolve. The project was renamed Luminance at the change to version 2.0 and is not at 2.0.2-pre1

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.9.3 (old version)
2.0.2-pre1 (new version)


http://qtpfsgui.sourceforge.net/


The author of the programme provides a 32bit fedora 14 package that worked fine until Fedora bumped libexiv2 from .so.9 to .so.10. so I think there would be good support from the author to get Luminance-HDR building ok on fedora 15.

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2011-04-28 15:34:27 UTC

Not exactly an "EasyFix", we'll likely need to new package review for the renamed package, and testing for upgrade-paths, eol/retire qtpfsgui, ... yada yada.

Comment 2 Romain DEP. 2011-05-02 10:00:29 UTC

Interested too, staying around if testers are wanted :)

Comment 3 Andrei ILIE 2011-10-02 13:56:32 UTC

I use Fedora 15 and only find "qtpfsgui" package in the repos, wich is is outdated.

Please switch to Luminance HDR (current version: 2.1.0).

Comment 4 Andrei ILIE 2011-10-02 13:58:19 UTC

possible dupe of bug 666500

Comment 5 Rex Dieter 2012-03-03 16:49:52 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 798715 ***