Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Broken dependency on deprecated hal|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Honza Horak <hhorak>|
|Component:||exo||Assignee:||Christoph Wickert <cwickert>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||cwickert, kevin, maxamillion, nsoranzo|
|Fixed In Version:||xfburn-0.4.3-5.fc15||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2011-04-27 07:01:25 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Honza Horak 2011-04-26 08:51:23 EDT
Description of problem: Since HAL has been deprecated upstream for 3 years, Fedora and all major distributions are removing it: The hal package has already been deprecated by its maintainer and blocked from composes for rawhide. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval There is "done" in the aforementioned link by component exo, but there is still dependency on hal in exo.spec in Rawhide: BuildRequires: hal-devel Why is "done" there then? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): exo-0.6.0-3
Comment 1 Christoph Wickert 2011-04-26 09:56:22 EDT
(In reply to comment #0) > Why is "done" there then? How about asking the feature owners of the feature that was never approved? ;)
Comment 2 Christoph Wickert 2011-04-26 10:19:24 EDT
For exo the dependency is no longer needed, however this wont help us with thunar-vfs and xfburn.
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2011-04-26 10:29:54 EDT
exo-0.6.0-5.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exo-0.6.0-5.fc15
Comment 4 Honza Horak 2011-04-26 10:31:54 EDT
(In reply to comment #1) > > Why is "done" there then? > How about asking the feature owners of the feature that was never approved? ;) Good point :) (In reply to comment #2) > For exo the dependency is no longer needed, however this wont help us with > thunar-vfs and xfburn. According to xfburn's README, dependency on thunar-vfs is only optional, so if the change of thunar-vfs would be a long-term process, xfburn can be built without it, doesn't it?
Comment 5 Christoph Wickert 2011-04-26 10:53:19 EDT
It seems thunar-vfs indeed builds without hal now. I will queue build later.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2011-04-26 11:34:50 EDT
Package exo-0.6.0-5.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing exo-0.6.0-5.fc15' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exo-0.6.0-5.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Comment 7 Christoph Wickert 2011-04-27 07:01:25 EDT
Package is in rawhide, for F15 I have requested a buildroot overwrite for exo and thunar-vfs  to build xfburn. Once that is done all three will be deployed in one update.  https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4668
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-04-27 08:26:32 EDT
xfburn-0.4.3-5.fc15,thunar-vfs-1.2.0-3.fc15,exo-0.6.0-5.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfburn-0.4.3-5.fc15,thunar-vfs-1.2.0-3.fc15,exo-0.6.0-5.fc15
Comment 9 Nicola Soranzo 2011-04-28 06:10:39 EDT
(In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Why is "done" there then? > > How about asking the feature owners of the feature that was never approved? ;) Because I was not tracking dependencies on hal-devel, since the original goal was to just remove hal from the Desktop spin. Now that hal package has been deprecated, I will also do that, thanks for the suggestion!
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2011-05-01 23:37:22 EDT
xfburn-0.4.3-5.fc15, thunar-vfs-1.2.0-3.fc15, exo-0.6.0-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.