Bug 70032

Summary: redhat-config-xfree86 aborts with error
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta Reporter: Ted Clark <bison>
Component: redhat-config-xfree86Assignee: Alexander Larsson <alexl>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: limboCC: mharris
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-08-07 13:23:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 67217    

Description Ted Clark 2002-07-29 14:17:32 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.0 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20020408

Description of problem:
redhat-config-xfree86 aborts with the following error:

[tclark@sys1976 tclark]$ redhat-config-xfree86 &
[1] 2678
[tclark@sys1976 tclark]$ Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/redhat-config-xfree86/xconf.py", line 1484, in ?
    dialog.update_ui()
  File "/usr/share/redhat-config-xfree86/xconf.py", line 1046, in update_ui
    if not res_radio.get_active():
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_active'

[1]+  Done                    redhat-config-xfree86

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run redhat-config-xfree86
2.
3.
	

Actual Results:  Aborts with error.

Expected Results:  Should run without error.

Additional info:

Intel 815 chipset on mobo.

Comment 1 Alexander Larsson 2002-08-07 10:04:36 UTC
What version of redhat-config-xfree86 is this?
Can you try the latest one in rawhide?


Comment 2 Ted Clark 2002-08-07 13:23:10 UTC
This bug was reported against the version in Limbo1.  I just tried the version
in Limbo2 (0.5.1-1) and it works on my system without any problems.  One thing I
did notice is that the /etc/X11/XF86Config file that it generates is formatted
differently than the origianl version, although they both claim to have been
generated by Anaconda.