Bug 701815

Summary: Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: PRABIN KUMAR DATTA <linux.n.pkd>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting, pikachu.2014
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-09 15:42:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 182235    

Description PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-03 23:43:12 UTC
Spec URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vo-amrwbenc.spec 
SRPM URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vo-amrwbenc-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
This library contains an encoder implementation of the Adaptive 
Multi Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) audio codec. The library is based 
on a codec implementation by VisualOn as part of the Stagefright 
framework from the Google Android project.

Comment 1 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-03 23:44:00 UTC
Koji Build:

Comment 2 Mohamed El Morabity 2011-05-03 23:59:25 UTC
Isn't AMR-WB patented?
This may be a FE-LEGAL issue.

Comment 3 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-04 01:48:48 UTC
Like you I was also little bit confused at the beginning.
After Googling a little bit, I found that AMR-BW/G.722.2 is patent under VoiceAge.
vo-amrbw is created by VisualOn. Also, it is clearly written that "The library is based on a codec implementation by VisualOn, part of the Stagefright framework from the Google Android project."

Thou, if you (or anyone else) are sure about patent thing kindly inform me.

Comment 4 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-08 21:22:03 UTC
Upstream Comment on FE-Legal issue:

vo-aacenc is one library implementing an AAC encoder, libfaac
is another. The patents don't cover any particular implementation -
they're essential to implementing the standard and thus cover all

So there can not be any implementations of AAC (nor AMR-WB) that isn't
covered by patents.

Copyrightwise, however, they are proper opensource, contrary to some
earlier AAC and AMR-WB libraries, which were either totally
unredistributable (libamr) or that have dubious origin and thus aren't
considered properly redistributable either.

Comment 5 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-09 15:43:42 UTC
Submitted in rpmfusion: