Bug 701815

Summary:	Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	PRABIN KUMAR DATTA <linux.n.pkd>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, notting, pikachu.2014
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-09 15:42:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	182235

Description PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-03 23:43:12 UTC

Spec URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vo-amrwbenc.spec 
SRPM URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vo-amrwbenc-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: 
This library contains an encoder implementation of the Adaptive 
Multi Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) audio codec. The library is based 
on a codec implementation by VisualOn as part of the Stagefright 
framework from the Google Android project.

Comment 1 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-03 23:44:00 UTC

Koji Build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3048779

Comment 2 Mohamed El Morabity 2011-05-03 23:59:25 UTC

Isn't AMR-WB patented?
   http://www.ecplaza.net/news/0/27878/voiceage_announces_the.html
This may be a FE-LEGAL issue.

Comment 3 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-04 01:48:48 UTC

Like you I was also little bit confused at the beginning.
After Googling a little bit, I found that AMR-BW/G.722.2 is patent under VoiceAge.
vo-amrbw is created by VisualOn. Also, it is clearly written that "The library is based on a codec implementation by VisualOn, part of the Stagefright framework from the Google Android project."

Thou, if you (or anyone else) are sure about patent thing kindly inform me.

Comment 4 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-08 21:22:03 UTC

Upstream Comment on FE-Legal issue:

vo-aacenc is one library implementing an AAC encoder, libfaac
is another. The patents don't cover any particular implementation -
they're essential to implementing the standard and thus cover all
implementations.

So there can not be any implementations of AAC (nor AMR-WB) that isn't
covered by patents.

Copyrightwise, however, they are proper opensource, contrary to some
earlier AAC and AMR-WB libraries, which were either totally
unredistributable (libamr) or that have dubious origin and thus aren't
considered properly redistributable either.

Comment 5 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-09 15:43:42 UTC

Submitted in rpmfusion:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741