Bug 701886

Summary: Fix testsuite regressions in xmlsec1 package
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert>
Component: xmlsec1Assignee: Daniel Veillard <veillard>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.6   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-04 08:44:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Miroslav Vadkerti 2011-05-04 08:01:11 UTC 
Description of problem:
Rpmdiff shows testsuite regression that should be fixed in the code or -fno-strict-aliasing should be added.

https://errata.devel.redhat.com/rpmdiff/show/50387?result_id=765812

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xmlsec1-1.2.9-8.1.2

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run rpmdiff for package
  
Actual results:
RPMdiff testsuite regressions

Expected results:
No RPMdiff testsuite regressions

Additional info:
THis is not an regression
Comment 1 Daniel Veillard 2011-05-04 08:40:54 UTC 
As you said, it's not a regression. I don't have an urge to try to fix this
in RHEL-5 at this point, as the package has basically behaved as expected,
just that gcc raises more errors like this now.
Since the package is not in RHEL-6 and there is little use beside OpenOffice,
I doubt chasing the issue and making an errata over it is worth the time,

Daniel
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-05-04 08:44:58 UTC 
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.