Bug 702256
| Summary: | clang++ gives many errors when the c++ standard library is used | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joonas Sarajärvi <muep> | ||||
| Component: | llvm | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 15 | CC: | bos, dmalcolm, fedoration, michel | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-08-01 21:59:58 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Joonas Sarajärvi
2011-05-05 07:52:06 UTC
Created attachment 497005 [details]
output from running the compiler on a simple program
Clang 2.8 can't handle the GNU extensions we use in recent versions of libstdc++, I think 3.0 fares a little better, but for clang++ to be at all useful Fedora needs to ship an old set of libstdc++ headers for Clang to use (or ship libc++ but I don't know if that is usable on GNU/Linux) It would be good to upgrade to Clang 3.0 anyway, it has a number of bugfixes for C++ and at least one new warning that's found a real bug for me Unfortunately we can't update the LLVM/clang stack on existing Fedora versions -- LLVM is used by some key components (e.g. mesa). Fedora 16 will get clang 2.9. Upgrading to 3.0 was only a suggestion, but IIUC would still not allow clang++ to use the libstdc++ 4.6 headers shipped with Fedora, which is what this bug is actually about. Does clang 2.9 work for trivial C++ code? If not, what about using an alternative set of libstdc++ headers from an older GCC? clang-3.0-0.1.rc3.fc17.i686 in current Rawhide seems to work much just fine when used with libstdc++. Hopefully Fedora 17 will end up with a working combination of clang and libstdc++. |