Bug 702644

Summary:	Split IPA advisory into ipa-client and ipa-server
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Jenny Severance <jgalipea>
Component:	ipa	Assignee:	Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.0	CC:	dpal, mkosek, rousseau, syeghiay
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-11-20 15:55:07 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Jenny Severance 2011-05-06 12:59:05 UTC

Description of problem:

Currently the IPA advisory for client and server and combined.  IPA server is only supported on x86_64 and i386 arches and only Server distributions.  The adivisories as is  - is for all RHEL supported arches and distributions.  Some of the dependent packages are not provided on all of them.  This makes completing advisory TPS testing impossible.  In order to get somewhat satisfactory results, the following was done:

1) removed all errata dependencies 
2) run make lists manually and remove the ipa-client packages from the obsoleted file list ( bug logged for TPS to handle this case ) 
3) installed all dependent packages from rhnqa and those not available, downloaded from brew and installed (different depending on arch and/or distribution type) 
4) run tps -m - install any other missing dependent packages 
5) repeat run tps -m 

There is a problem with srpm rebuild on x86_64 workstation and client for ipa-server (Note: these are not supported distributions).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ipa-server-2.0.0-23.el6.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Rob Crittenden 2011-05-09 15:03:58 UTC

What exactly do you mean by separate advisories? A errata is based on a package, are you requesting that the ipa package be split?

Comment 3 Dmitri Pal 2011-05-10 21:40:05 UTC

We do not need to do this based on the recent developments.