Bug 702892
Summary: | Review Request: python-modjkapi - API for modjk management | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tim Bielawa <tbielawa> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Kevin Fenzi <kevin> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-05-12 20:29:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 701426 |
Description
Tim Bielawa
2011-05-08 05:22:57 UTC
I'll go ahead and review this. Look for a full review hopefully later today. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv3+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 72a6c9e090ca7ef20366a22235c658f7 modjkapi-0.1.2.28.tar.gz 72a6c9e090ca7ef20366a22235c658f7 modjkapi-0.1.2.28.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. The /usr/bin/bleeder binary seems oddly named. Is there some history there? 2. rpmlint says: python-modjkapi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bleeder python-modjkapi.src: W: strange-permission modjkapi-0.1.2.28.tar.gz 0660L Might set the perms to 644? Or might be something odd on my end. The man page warning you can ignore, but of course it's nice to add a man page too. ;) (In reply to comment #2) Spec URL remains the same: http://people.redhat.com/~tbielawa/modjkapi/python-modjkapi.spec SRPM changed to: http://people.redhat.com/~tbielawa/modjkapi/releases/modjkapi-latest/python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.fc14.src.rpm > Issues: > > 1. The /usr/bin/bleeder binary seems oddly named. Is there some history there? Heh, when used in context the name made more sense. It 'bleeds off connections' from a node in a load balancer pool, before removing the node -- but it also reenables nodes. I've renamed it to something more descriptive: 'jk-rotate' because 'gracefully putting nodes into and out of rotation' is an easier concept to grok. > 2. rpmlint says: > > python-modjkapi.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bleeder > python-modjkapi.src: W: strange-permission modjkapi-0.1.2.28.tar.gz 0660L > > Might set the perms to 644? Or might be something odd on my end. Indeed, my umask was creating the sdist with those perms. This time before I built the srpm I manually set the perms to the recommended 0644. > The man page warning you can ignore... Never > ...but of course it's nice to add a man page too. ;) I agree. Therefore I have added a man page, as per your suggestion. Excellent. That addresses everything I see, so this package is APPROVED. I will go ahead and sponsor you. You can continue the process from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner Please do let me know if you have any questions, either via email or catch me on irc (nick: nirik). Welcome to the fun! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-modjkapi Short Description: API for modjk management Owners: tbielawa Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Koji builds complete: - el5 - el6 - f14 python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.el5 python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.el6 python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.fc14 python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. python-modjkapi-0.1.2.28-7.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. |