Bug 703393

Summary: Printer Settings on Windows Client are not applied after update to samba3.5
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Guenther Deschner <gdeschner>
Component: sambaAssignee: Guenther Deschner <gdeschner>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Martin Cermak <mcermak>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.2CC: acavalla, azelinka, dpal, gdeschner, mcermak, prc
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: samba-3.5.8-89.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: When choosing paper formats on a Samba shared printer from a Windows client, these changes were not saved on the Samba server. Consequence: Changing properties of printers had no effect. Fix: A paper format mismatch inside the Samba server has been fixed. Result: Printer settings are stored correctly again.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 698400 Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 16:25:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 698400    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 9 Guenther Deschner 2011-11-25 12:05:51 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Cause: When choosing paper formats on a Samba shared printer from a Windows client, these changes were not saved on the Samba server.

Consequence: Changing properties of printers had no effect.

Fix: A paper format mismatch inside the Samba server has been fixed.

Result: Printer settings are stored correctly again.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 16:25:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1519.html