| Summary: | emacs and emacs-nox don't need to own libexecdir | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Component: | emacs | Assignee: | Karel Klíč <kklic> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jonathan.underwood, kklic, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | emacs-23.3-5.fc16 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-23 14:48:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Agreed. I also don't see any reason for emacs(-nox) to own the libexec dirs. |
Hi, this might be my fault or a historic artefact... but I think %{_libexecdir}/emacs/ can and probably should be just owned by emacs-common? At least I can't see or think of any good reason why emacs and emacs-nox still need to own the libexec dirs. Otherwise might be good to put an explanation into the .spec file. :)