| Summary: | [RFE] Regrouped WWID | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Frederic Hornain <fhornain> |
| Component: | device-mapper-multipath | Assignee: | LVM and device-mapper development team <lvm-team> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | agk, bmarzins, dwysocha, heinzm, mbroz, prajnoha, prockai, zkabelac |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-12 14:53:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Frederic Hornain
2011-05-12 12:57:30 UTC
Well, there's a difference between doable and supported. device-mapper-multipath allows you to set a getuid_callout in /etc/multipath.conf. You could theoretically set this to anything that you like. So you probably could merge your devices into one device. The path checker and path priority functions are DSOs, so if you need to make your own one of these so that you can have multipath setup the devices properly, that's more work, but again, it should be doable. It's quite likely that the default path checkers will work fine. You will probably need to make your own path_priority DSO, so that you can force the difference LUNs into different path groups. If the replicated LUN is read-only, instead of offline, you will likely have a problem of device-mapper creating a read-only map. Again, I want to emphasize that this is not what device-mapper-multipath is for. Once you mess with the getuid_callout so that you're lumping different LUNs together, you need to be very sure that you won't ever link the wrong devices together. Even still, I can't be certain that this will work correctly with your SAN mirroring setup, although I can't think of any problems off the top of my head. A vastly better solution would be to get storage hardware that could present you will one LUN that was on top of the mirrored devices. |