Comment 5Elio Maldonado Batiz
2011-06-03 17:54:40 UTC
Created attachment 502875[details]
the patch from upstream
Not directely applicable with RHEL 5. Will attach the modified version next.
Comment 6Elio Maldonado Batiz
2011-06-03 17:58:43 UTC
The patch need to be adjusted as follows:
+@@ -46,11 +46,46 @@
#include "secasn1.h"
#include "crmfit.h"
#include "secerr.h"
+#include "blapit.h"
++
++/* RSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS is not defined in older versions
++ * of blapit.h such as the one from nss 3.11.5
++ */
++#ifndef RSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS
++#define RSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS 8192
++#endif
++#define MAX_WRAPPED_KEY_LEN RSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS
Comment 7Elio Maldonado Batiz
2011-06-03 18:01:49 UTC
Created attachment 502878[details]
patch ajusted for RHEL 5 to add for the missing macro definition if needed
Comment on attachment 502878[details]
patch ajusted for RHEL 5 to add for the missing macro definition if needed
r+ since it the same patch I r+ upstream;).
bob
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0291.html
Created attachment 502875 [details] the patch from upstream Not directely applicable with RHEL 5. Will attach the modified version next.