Bug 704644

Summary: confusing warning message when rhsm-icon runs twice
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: John Sefler <jsefler>
Component: subscription-managerAssignee: Bryan Kearney <bkearney>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2CC: cduryee, jmolet, jsefler
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 702026 Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 17:14:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 702026    
Bug Blocks: 682238    

Comment 1 John Sefler 2011-05-13 20:22:44 UTC
This bug was cloned to ensure a verification that the fix was merged to rhel62.

Comment 3 Chris Duryee 2011-08-08 20:18:34 UTC
Tested that this was merged in. Moving to MODIFIED.

Comment 5 J.C. Molet 2011-08-16 17:30:38 UTC
[root@jmolet-vm0 ~]# rhsm-icon 

** (rhsm-icon:21402): CRITICAL **: rhsm-icon is already running. exiting.
[root@jmolet-vm0 ~]# rhsm-icon -d
** (rhsm-icon:21404): DEBUG: Failed to acquire com.redhat.subscription-manager.Icon

** (rhsm-icon:21404): CRITICAL **: rhsm-icon is already running. exiting.


These messages are clear and make sense.

subscription-manager-0.96.5-1.git.51.ac50478.el6.x86_64
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.96.5-1.git.51.ac50478.el6.x86_64
python-rhsm-0.96.8-1.git.5.d42033a.el6.noarch
subscription-manager-gnome-0.96.5-1.git.51.ac50478.el6.x86_64

Marking VERIFIED.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 17:14:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1695.html