Bug 704644
| Summary: | confusing warning message when rhsm-icon runs twice | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | John Sefler <jsefler> |
| Component: | subscription-manager | Assignee: | Bryan Kearney <bkearney> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | John Sefler <jsefler> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.2 | CC: | cduryee, jmolet, jsefler |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 702026 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 17:14:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 702026 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 682238 | ||
|
Comment 1
John Sefler
2011-05-13 20:22:44 UTC
Tested that this was merged in. Moving to MODIFIED. [root@jmolet-vm0 ~]# rhsm-icon ** (rhsm-icon:21402): CRITICAL **: rhsm-icon is already running. exiting. [root@jmolet-vm0 ~]# rhsm-icon -d ** (rhsm-icon:21404): DEBUG: Failed to acquire com.redhat.subscription-manager.Icon ** (rhsm-icon:21404): CRITICAL **: rhsm-icon is already running. exiting. These messages are clear and make sense. subscription-manager-0.96.5-1.git.51.ac50478.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-firstboot-0.96.5-1.git.51.ac50478.el6.x86_64 python-rhsm-0.96.8-1.git.5.d42033a.el6.noarch subscription-manager-gnome-0.96.5-1.git.51.ac50478.el6.x86_64 Marking VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1695.html |