Bug 705027

Summary:	sestatus usage message not complete (missing -b option)
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	David Kutálek <dkutalek>
Component:	policycoreutils	Assignee:	Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	6.1	CC:	dwalsh, mmalik
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	705031 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 15:30:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	705031

Description David Kutálek 2011-05-16 12:51:25 UTC

Description of problem:

$ ./compare-options.sh /usr/sbin/sestatus
Program path:
	/usr/sbin/sestatus
Man pages found:
	/usr/share/man/man8/sestatus.8.gz
The binary analysis was NOT done
Doing man page vs. usage message comparison

The program reported 1 option(s)
The man page reported 2 option(s)
1 COMMON option(s):
	-v
0 option(s) reported by the program ONLY:
1 option(s) reported by the man page ONLY:
	-b

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.8.el6_0

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. sestatus --help ; man sestatus
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

-b option missing in usage message

Expected results:

There are only two options, so I would expect both to be present in usage message.

Additional info:

Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2011-05-26 15:03:51 UTC

Fixed in policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.2.el6

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 15:30:49 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1637.html