Bug 705239

Summary: IncludeAll, Include directives in GDM's custom.conf no longer work
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Richard Schwarting <aquarichy>
Component: gdmAssignee: Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: cheese, jmccann, rstrode, vaughn.jayson
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-22 17:44:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
schemas-file
none
my custom.conf none

Description Richard Schwarting 2011-05-17 05:42:42 UTC 
Description of problem:
In Fedora 14, in /etc/gdm/custom.conf, I have set this:
  [greeter]
  IncludeAll=false
  Include=myuser,guest
There are more users on the system, but this meant only these two were shown in GDM.

In Fedora 15, more users than fit in the user list now appear (even obscuring the login field (see bug #699389)), despite still having the above set. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gdm-3.0.0-3.fc15

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit /etc/gdm/custom.conf to limit which accounts can display
2. Restart your computer
3. See more accounts than those listed :(
  
Actual results:
Accounts that should not show appear in the list.

Expected results:
I should only see accounts related to the usernames in the list.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:28:49 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:31:00 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 3 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:33:34 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:36:21 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 5 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:42:36 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 6 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:46:42 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 7 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:48:54 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 8 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:50:59 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 9 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-21 15:52:22 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 10 Jayson Vaughn 2011-07-06 18:49:07 UTC 
Thank you for your bug report.

Can you please attach your /usr/share/gdm/gdm.schema file.

Thanks.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Comment 11 josef radinger 2011-09-03 18:38:27 UTC 
i have the same problem.
Comment 12 josef radinger 2011-09-03 18:39:22 UTC 
Created attachment 521336 [details]
schemas-file
Comment 13 josef radinger 2011-09-03 18:41:00 UTC 
Created attachment 521337 [details]
my custom.conf
Comment 14 Ryan Lerch 2013-03-22 15:34:26 UTC 
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684019
Comment 15 Ryan Lerch 2013-03-22 15:35:59 UTC 
There is an upstream bug tracking this issue:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684019

cheers,
ryanlerch