Bug 705377

Summary: Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Xavier Bachelot <xavier>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: emmanuel, fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: emmanuel: fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-28 20:27:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 705382    

Description Xavier Bachelot 2011-05-17 14:33:11 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-AuthCAS.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: 
AuthCAS aims at providing a Perl API to Yale's Central Authentication
System (CAS). Only a basic Perl library is provided with CAS whereas
AuthCAS is a full object-oriented library.

Comment 1 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-05-21 15:14:00 UTC
Taking.

Comment 2 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-05-21 18:40:42 UTC
=== KEY ===

 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===

 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items

Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire, not a Require. Please fix your spec.

 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326

 [x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type: GPL+ or Artistic
 [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
cfc26405b47d498496e0c5557d2a9fb2  AuthCAS-1.5.tar.gz

 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===

 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: rawhide.x86_64
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
     Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=2,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.01 sys +  0.11 cusr  0.02 csys =  0.16 CPU)
Result: PASS

NOT APPROVED.

Comment 3 Xavier Bachelot 2011-05-21 18:50:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
>  [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
> 
> Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire,
> not a Require. Please fix your spec.
> 
Yes, indeed. I was about to fix it when you posted.

http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-AuthCAS.spec
http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm

Comment 4 Emmanuel Seyman 2011-05-21 22:01:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm

APPROVED

Comment 5 Xavier Bachelot 2011-05-22 03:26:41 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-AuthCAS
Short Description: Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Owners: xavierb
Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6
InitialCC: perl-sig


Thanks for the review Emmanuel :-)

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-23 17:43:04 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Xavier Bachelot 2011-06-28 20:27:32 UTC
Built and released for all branches.