Bug 705448

Summary: CVE-2011-1407 CVE-2011-1764 exim various flaws [epel-6]
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Vincent Danen <vdanen>
Component: eximAssignee: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: el6CC: dwmw2, jskarvad, tremble
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Release Note
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-14 18:28:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 702474, 705446    

Description Vincent Danen 2011-05-17 17:54:05 UTC
epel-6 tracking bug for exim: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s).

This bug is never intended to be made public, please put any public notes
in the 'blocks' bugs.


[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]

Comment 1 Vincent Danen 2011-05-17 17:54:22 UTC
    Adding parent bug CVE-2011-1764
    New bodhi update url:
    https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=705446,702474

Comment 2 Vincent Danen 2012-08-10 18:39:22 UTC
Hi, Mark.

It seems like there was some mis-naming of CVEs when you included exim-4.72-0003-CVE-2011-1407.patch in:

* Wed May 18 2011 Mark Chappell <tremble.uk> 4.72-2

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702474#c5

It looks like, based on Ubuntu's CVE page, that the actual fix for CVE-2011-1407 is here:

http://git.exim.org/exim.git/blobdiff/337e3505b0e6cd4309db6bf6062b33fa56e06cf8..ae9094bfe313aeb9ffefc7566bd4dae49ada3cf5:/src/src/receive.c

and what you called CVE-2011-1407 actually fixed CVE-2011-1764.

Do you think you could apply the above patch to fix CVE-2011-1407, and that would resolve all outstanding exim flaws?  Thanks!

Comment 3 Vincent Danen 2012-10-26 15:08:21 UTC
Ping?  This has not yet been resolved, but exim has been updated for a new flaw today, and CVE-2011-1407 is still unfixed.

Comment 4 Jaroslav Škarvada 2012-10-26 15:14:12 UTC
Well, in case of no response from Mark, I can check it as a co-maintainer.

Comment 5 Mark Chappell 2012-10-26 16:40:25 UTC
Jaroslav, 

If you have the time to update that would be appreciated, I really have sucked at keeping up with this, work's been insane.


Mark

Comment 6 Jaroslav Škarvada 2012-10-26 18:44:28 UTC
Mark, thanks for info, I will look on it.

Comment 7 Vincent Danen 2012-10-27 06:06:54 UTC
Thank you both, very much, for this.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-10-28 18:35:37 UTC
exim-4.72-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exim-4.72-4.el6

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-10-29 18:40:00 UTC
Package exim-4.72-4.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing exim-4.72-4.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-13339/exim-4.72-4.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-11-14 18:28:13 UTC
exim-4.72-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.