Bug 706051
Summary: | poor throughput of tcp_stream from exhost to guest . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Quan Wenli <wquan> |
Component: | kvm | Assignee: | Michael S. Tsirkin <mst> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.7 | CC: | gcosta, juzhang, mkenneth, virt-maint |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-06-02 12:26:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 580948 |
Description
Quan Wenli
2011-05-19 10:32:15 UTC
also get poor throughtput of tcp_stream on rhel5.6 with kernel-2.6.18-238.el5/kvm-83-224.el5 by using the same steps in "Steps to Reproduce:" ./netperf -H 192.168.0.101 -l 60 TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.0.101 (192.168.0.101) port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 16384 60.01 3.59 throughput of tcp_stream got very obvious speedup by just disabled rsc with 'ethtool -C eth2 rx-usecs 0'. #netperf -H 192.168.0.101 TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.0.101 (192.168.0.101) port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 16384 10.01 2902.13 I also try disabled netfilter on bridge and disabled hw rsc,got about 2925.84 Mbps throughput of tcp_stream .But such virtio performance can not be accepted also. So this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703416 as far as I can tell. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 703416 *** |