Bug 706557

Summary: can't define VM service with sibling resources
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: joshua
Component: luciAssignee: Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: cluster-maint
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-20 23:57:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description joshua 2011-05-20 22:37:34 UTC
Description of problem:

When defining a VM as a cluster service, I can't specify another child/parent/sibling resource of a GFS2 filesystem.  This is tricky, because my VM lives in files *on a GFS2* filesystem!  I've had the VM service fail to start a few times on nodes when no other services (where I could define a GFS2 resource) were on that cluster node, such that the GFS2 filesystem wasn't mounted. 

Surely this is a mistake in luci's design!  A VM might actually need other resources as part of its cluster service definition!



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

RHEL 6.1 everything

Comment 2 Ryan McCabe 2011-05-20 23:57:05 UTC
VMs cannot have children. VMs aren't a resource, as such. They're a type of entity on par with services as far as rgmanager is concerned, so different rules apply. There's more info in the rgmanager man page.