| Summary: | [abrt] simple-scan-2.32.0.1-1.fc14: memcpy: Process /usr/bin/simple-scan was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Raphael Groner <projects.rg> | ||||
| Component: | simple-scan | Assignee: | Rahul Sundaram <metherid> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | bugzilla, metherid | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:d28cf268ebe22fd138df14e0b411a14999330305 | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-21 14:41:04 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Raphael Groner
2011-05-21 09:46:17 UTC
Created attachment 500176 [details]
File: backtrace
Package: simple-scan-2.32.0.1-1.fc14 Architecture: x86_64 OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) How to reproduce ----- 1. cancel running scan process 2. click on new document 3. Comment ----- Bus 006 Device 003: ID 04a9:220d Canon, Inc. CanoScan N670U/N676U/LiDE 20 Package: simple-scan-2.32.0.2-1.fc15 Architecture: x86_64 OS Release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock) Comment ----- During scanning I pressed the 'New document'-button. (In reply to comment #3) Hi Gerhard, have you tried to reproduce this bug in Fedora 15 or 16? I am asking cause Fedora 14 is EOL. Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #664344, closing as duplicate. Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #664344, bug #694340 This comment is automatically generated. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 664344 *** |