Bug 706850

Summary:	back to advanced-search form from result page, the component can't be reserve.
Product:	[Other] TCMS	Reporter:	Danqing Li <dli>
Component:	Application	Assignee:	Chaobin Tang <ctang>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	tools-bugs <tools-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.4	CC:	ctang, dli, junzhang, jzhao, nli, ryang, vchen
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	TestOnly
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-26 06:32:33 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	707905, 707908

Description Danqing Li 2011-05-23 08:53:12 UTC

Description of problem:

search for items by component. and click the back button of browser, go back to the advanced search form. the component selected been lost. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. advanced search
2. search case by product and component
3. back to the advanced search form.

  
Actual results:

the product selection has reserved ,and component lost.

Expected results:

All selections and keywords reserved. 

Additional info:

Comment 1 Chaobin Tang 2011-05-31 08:51:42 UTC

GIT COMMIT ID: 56395a3982b3a467808b9d7177454a1a0b885bca

Product selections will be remembered back to the form page from results page, and relevant version or build or component options will be loaded automatically, however selections on them are NOT remembered in current implementation.

Comment 2 Jin Zhao 2011-06-08 05:11:34 UTC

Verify version 3.4.1 hot-fix    -->FAIL
Actual result:
Not only component but also version can not be reserved.

Comment 3 Chaobin Tang 2011-06-08 05:52:49 UTC

So it turned out to be pointless for me to add "however selections on them are NOT remembered in current implementation." ?

Comment 4 Jin Zhao 2011-06-09 07:05:22 UTC

I believed this functional is not useful for all QE. 
Such as if I want to search via different item, I must clear the reserved selections first. It's surplus Operating for me.

Comment 5 Danqing Li 2011-12-26 06:32:33 UTC

Deferred to 4.0