| Summary: | [abrt] gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14: g_mutex_free_posix_impl: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | lev <red.ostrava> | ||||
| Component: | gvfs | Assignee: | Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | alexl, bnocera, tbzatek, tsmetana, vadim2071 | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:9f78ee8ce5adbede83d179a63b136d18c953c86f | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-20 19:34:36 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
lev
2011-05-23 11:59:56 UTC
Created attachment 500406 [details]
File: backtrace
Package: gvfs-1.8.1-2.fc15 Architecture: x86_64 OS Release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock) Comment ----- Just deleted a file. Package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14 Architecture: i686 OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) How to reproduce ----- 1.mount ftp-server in nautilus 2.work 3.unmount 4. oops! Package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14 Architecture: i686 OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) Comment ----- problem with ftp-server on router Package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14 Architecture: i686 OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) How to reproduce ----- 1. disconnect from ftp server 2. 3. Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #658241, closing as duplicate. Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #651312, bug #658241, bug #666615 This comment is automatically generated. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 658241 *** |