Bug 707912
| Summary: | net-snmp does not see mounted XFS filesystem | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Karel Srot <ksrot> |
| Component: | net-snmp | Assignee: | Jan Safranek <jsafrane> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | pasteur, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Prior this update, the snmpd daemon ignored XFS filesystems when populating HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrFSTable and these filesystems were simply not reported there. This update adds XFS filesystem support to HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrFSTable in snmpd. (BZ#707912).
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 17:11:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Karel Srot
2011-05-26 10:19:18 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
Prior this update, the snmpd daemon ignored XFS filesystems when populating HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrFSTable and these filesystems were simply not reported there. This update adds XFS filesystem support to HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrFSTable in snmpd. (BZ#707912).
regression from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, also listed at http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5203 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1524.html |