Bug 708226

Summary: extraneous punctuation in "Available Subscriptions" column ('97 of 100',)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: John Sefler <jsefler>
Component: subscription-managerAssignee: John Sefler <jsefler>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2CC: spandey
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 6.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 17:14:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 682238    
Attachments:
Description Flags
just another example with ('15 of 15',)
none
extraneous punctuation has been removed from "N of T" values in Subscription Assistant none

Description John Sefler 2011-05-26 23:05:37 UTC
Description of problem:
See the screeshot.
would be prettier if the parenthesis were trimmed off the subscription count

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@jsefler-rhel57-beta12-i386 ~]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager
subscription-manager-0.95.5.19-1.git.1.8278e3d.el5
subscription-manager-firstboot-0.95.5.19-1.git.1.8278e3d.el5
subscription-manager-gnome-0.95.5.19-1.git.1.8278e3d.el5

Comment 1 John Sefler 2011-05-26 23:09:54 UTC
Created attachment 501208 [details]
just another example with ('15 of 15',)

Comment 4 John Sefler 2011-07-12 16:43:16 UTC
Created attachment 512474 [details]
extraneous punctuation has been removed from "N of T" values in Subscription Assistant

Verifying Version...
[root@jsefler-onprem-62server ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-gnome
subscription-manager-gnome-0.96.3-1.git.33.8f93d7f.el6.x86_64

moving to VERIFIED

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 17:14:48 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1695.html