Bug 708342

Summary: brp-java-repack-jars causes rpmbuild to fail
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Levente Farkas <lfarkas>
Component: redhat-rpm-configAssignee: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2CC: syeghiay
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-10-15 09:41:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Levente Farkas 2011-05-27 11:08:09 UTC
the same bug as #250295 and #566528 still exist on rhel-6.1. the solution was described in :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250295#c12
it'd have to apply to rhel-6 too!

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 01:33:57 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-10-07 16:04:05 UTC
Since RHEL 6.2 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 4 Levente Farkas 2012-03-14 16:37:21 UTC
ping?

Comment 5 Panu Matilainen 2012-10-15 09:41:53 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 822073 ***