Bug 708403

Summary: New Tamron 70-300 mm lens improperly recognized
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: tosca <mnaugendre>
Component: exiv2Assignee: Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: madko, marbolangos, mcepl, mcepl, michel, rdieter
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Patch, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc15 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-10-05 17:33:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
A raw picture taken with a Tamron 70-300 mm F4–5,6 Di VC USD none

Description tosca 2011-05-27 14:49:12 UTC
Created attachment 501322 [details]
A raw picture taken with a Tamron 70-300 mm F4–5,6 Di VC USD

Description of problem:
Following a bug report I've submitted regarding the exiv2 library (new Tamron lens improperly recognized), two patches are now available: http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/772
Would it be possible to get the updated exiv2 version in the official repository?


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a RAW picture produced with a Tamron 70-300 mm F4–5,6 Di VC USD in a program using exiv2, such as Digikam or Darktable
2. Display the metadata; the lens is identified as a Canon EF 28-105 mm
3.
  
Actual results:
Programs using the exiv2 library (such as Digikam and Darktable) have no way to recognize this lens.

Expected results:
The Tamron 70-300 will be properly recongnized.

Additional info: 
bug report for exiv2 and links to the patches http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/772

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2011-05-27 14:55:15 UTC
Thanks, I'll take a look.

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2011-09-27 14:04:47 UTC
exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc14

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2011-09-27 14:05:41 UTC
exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc15

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2011-09-27 14:06:35 UTC
exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc16

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2011-09-27 17:32:22 UTC
Package exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc16:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc16'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc16
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2011-10-05 17:33:08 UTC
exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 tosca 2011-10-05 21:58:00 UTC
I'm running Fedora 15, and don't find any new revision in the repository; I still have exiv2-0.21.1-1.fc15 and yum doesn't seem to propose anything newer.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-10-05 23:59:27 UTC
exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2011-10-06 00:03:33 UTC
exiv2-0.21.1-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.