Bug 708569

Summary: Move s390utils-cmsfs-fuse from optional to default channels
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Brad Hinson <bhinson>
Component: relengAssignee: Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: atodorov, borgan, dgregor, dhorak, dmach, notting
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: s390x   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 18:47:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Brad Hinson 2011-05-28 04:06:38 UTC
Description of problem:
s390utils-cmsfs-fuse was added in RHEL 6.1 from bug 631546.  System z users may not know to look in the optional channel for this (wasn't mentioned in the tech notes) so this request is to add the package to the default channels for 6.2 (or earlier if possible).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
s390utils-cmsfs-fuse-1.8.2-36.el6.s390x

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 01:34:01 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 2 Brad Hinson 2011-07-18 17:14:37 UTC
Requesting reconsideration of this request.  No development effort required, just a request to move this package from optional channel into base, along with the other s390utils packages.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-18 17:18:13 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 5 Dennis Gregorovic 2011-07-18 19:45:56 UTC
Brad, adding this package to base would require it be part of a comps group.  Is there one that you would suggest?

Comment 6 Dan HorĂ¡k 2011-07-26 13:52:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Brad, adding this package to base would require it be part of a comps group. 
> Is there one that you would suggest?

Dennis, I would place the s390utils-cmsfs-fuse package to the Base group as "default" on s390x

Comment 7 Dennis Gregorovic 2011-07-26 15:20:34 UTC
comps.xml updated.  The package will be in base in the next compose.

Comment 10 Alexander Todorov 2011-08-22 12:29:04 UTC
# pwd
/mnt/redhat/nightly/RHEL6.2-20110822.n.0/6

# find -name "*comps*.xml" | xargs grep s390utils-cmsfs-fuse 
./Server/s390x/os/Server/repodata/442b63c0d6cfb596b0fda059accd8e87b1cfd580bc94ed7bd3455e3cfe46cd4a-comps-rhel6-Server.xml:      <packagereq type='default'>s390utils-cmsfs-fuse</packagereq>
./Server/s390x/os/repodata/442b63c0d6cfb596b0fda059accd8e87b1cfd580bc94ed7bd3455e3cfe46cd4a-comps-rhel6-Server.xml:      <packagereq type='default'>s390utils-cmsfs-fuse</packagereq>

# find -name "s390utils-cmsfs-fuse*"
./Server/s390x/os/Packages/s390utils-cmsfs-fuse-1.8.2-38.el6.s390x.rpm

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 18:47:22 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1743.html