Bug 709412
Summary: | subscription manager cli uses product name comparisons in the list command | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Bryan Kearney <bkearney> | ||||
Component: | subscription-manager | Assignee: | Bryan Kearney <bkearney> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | John Sefler <jsefler> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | urgent | ||||||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | adellape, alikins, andriusb, dgregor, jwest, mkhusid, spurrier, xdmoon | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: |
Two variations were used in the ProductName parameter for the workstation subscription: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation" and "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation". As a consequence, users running the "subscription-manager list --installed" command, while subscribed to the "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation" subscription, got a misleading report. With this update, the ProductId parameter is used instead to compare subscriptions in the described scenario, and the bug no longer occurs.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 17:14:50 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 568421, 675214, 682238, 712130 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Bryan Kearney
2011-05-31 16:32:12 UTC
Is RHEL 5.7 also affected? Created attachment 502669 [details] product "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation" shows as being installed and subscribed in the gui This is a re-create to demonstrate the problem on version... [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 6.1 (Santiago) [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager subscription-manager-0.95.14-1.el6_1.x86_64 subscription-manager-firstboot-0.95.14-1.el6_1.x86_64 subscription-manager-gnome-0.95.14-1.el6_1.x86_64 [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager register --username=stage_test_27 Password: f97ec64f-0c99-41de-a94b-f427309d674b jsefler-stage-6workstation.usersys.redhat.com [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager list --installed +-------------------------------------------+ Installed Product Status +-------------------------------------------+ ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation Status: Not Subscribed Expires: Subscription: ContractNumber: AccountNumber: [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager list --avail +-------------------------------------------+ Available Subscriptions +-------------------------------------------+ ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation, Standard ProductId: RH0958488 PoolId: 8a99f9812f270524012f4ab81d401bd7 Quantity: 93 Expires: 04/11/2012 [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager subscribe --pool=8a99f9812f270524012f4ab81d401bd7 [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager list --installed +-------------------------------------------+ Installed Product Status +-------------------------------------------+ ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Status: Not Installed Expires: 04/11/2012 Subscription: 4188631479613958945 ContractNumber: 2280400 AccountNumber: 1444077 ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation Status: Not Subscribed Expires: Subscription: ContractNumber: AccountNumber: [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager-gui& Notice in the attached screenshot that the gui reports "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation" as being installed and subscribed, yet the command line tool above shows that the installed product "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation" is "Not Subscribed" while "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation" is covered by the recent bind/subscribe, but is "Not Installed". I expected the command line tool to produce the following: [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager list --installed +-------------------------------------------+ Installed Product Status +-------------------------------------------+ ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation Status: Subscribed Expires: 04/11/2012 Subscription: 4188631479613958945 ContractNumber: 2280400 AccountNumber: 1444077 Additional Info: [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# openssl x509 -text -in /etc/pki/product/71.pem | grep -A1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.1: .&Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.2: ..6.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.3: ..x86_64 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.4: ..rhel-6,rhel-6-workstation [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# openssl x509 -text -in /etc/pki/entitlement/4188631479613958945.pem | grep -A1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.1: .$Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation ^^^ As indicated in comment 0, the cli tool should have used the product id "71" to match the entitlement cert with the installed product cert. Then this bug would be fixed despite the non-equal name values for OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.1 FYI, The same failure occurs on 6 Server... [root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# subscription-manager register --username=stage_test_28 --autosubscribe Password: c055d06b-ea8d-4cbd-8a57-2979d7b94186 jsefler-stage-6server.usersys.redhat.com Installed Products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - Not Installed Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server - Not Subscribed [root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# subscription-manager list --installed +-------------------------------------------+ Installed Product Status +-------------------------------------------+ ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Status: Not Installed Expires: 05/23/2012 Subscription: 341133359893088261 ContractNumber: 2280438 AccountNumber: 1444090 ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server Status: Not Subscribed Expires: Subscription: ContractNumber: AccountNumber: [root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# openssl x509 -text -in /etc/pki/product/69.pem | grep -A1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.69.1: .!Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.69.2: ..6.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.69.3: ..x86_64 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.69.4: ..rhel-6,rhel-6-server [root@jsefler-stage-6server ~]# openssl x509 -text -in /etc/pki/entitlement/6489788376715987382.pem | grep -A1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.69.1: ..Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server commit 11aa6649fab0328809918c0b3ce6810258656f10 Author: Adrian Likins <alikins> Date: Tue Jun 7 15:23:30 2011 -0400 709412: cli was using product names for ent cert-> product cert matching In some cases, this was wrong, so update it to use product ids. (merge) Verifying Version on a RHEL61 Workstation... [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager subscription-manager-firstboot-0.95.14-1.git.4.11aa664.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-0.95.14-1.git.4.11aa664.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-gnome-0.95.14-1.git.4.11aa664.el6.x86_64 [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager register --username=qa Password: 46ed309c-c60c-4474-9374-f258f8b10fd7 jsefler-stage-6workstation.usersys.redhat.com [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager list --installed +-------------------------------------------+ Installed Product Status +-------------------------------------------+ ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation Status: Not Subscribed Expires: Subscription: ContractNumber: AccountNumber: [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager list --avail | grep -A6 Workstation ProductName: 90 day Supported Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Evaluation ProductId: RH0939261 PoolId: 8a85f981302cbaf201304b4df59206fe Quantity: 99 Expires: 08/29/2011 [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager subscribe --pool=8a85f981302cbaf201304b4df59206fe [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# subscription-manager list --installed +-------------------------------------------+ Installed Product Status +-------------------------------------------+ ProductName: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Status: Subscribed Expires: 08/29/2011 Subscription: 5315563164113430490 ContractNumber: 2390960 AccountNumber: 477931 [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# openssl x509 -text -in /etc/pki/product/71.pem | grep -A1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.1: .&Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.2: ..6.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.3: ..x86_64 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.4: ..rhel-6,rhel-6-workstation [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# openssl x509 -text -in /etc/pki/entitlement/5315563164113430490.pem | grep -A1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.9.1.71.1: .$Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation [root@jsefler-stage-6workstation ~]# ^^^ VERIFIED. Despite the difference in name between the product cert and the entitlement cert ("Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation" versus "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation"), the cli call to subscription-manager list --installed now reports that the one workstation product is installed and subscribed. Also verified in the gui that the one workstation product is installed and subscribed. Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Two variations were used in the ProductName parameter for the workstation subscription: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation" and "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation". As a consequence, users running the "subscription-manager list --installed" command, while subscribed to the "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation" subscription, got a misleading report. With this update, the ProductId parameter is used instead to compare subscriptions in the described scenario, and the bug no longer occurs. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1695.html |