Bug 710185

Summary: /etc/services contains entry 0/tcp spr-itunes
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: haneyd
Component: setupAssignee: Ondrej Vasik <ovasik>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.1CC: azelinka, syeghiay
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: setup-2.8.14-14.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 12:23:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description haneyd 2011-06-02 15:43:54 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 haneyd 2011-06-02 15:47:59 UTC
/etc/services contains the following entries:

spr-itunes        0/tcp  spl-itunes     Shirt Pocket netTunes

But according to http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers:

   A value of 0 in the port numbers registry below indicates that no port 
   has been allocated.

Since a port hasn't been allocated by IANA, it doesn't seem like these entries should be included in the /etc/services files.

As a reference, it appears that these lines are commented out in SLES 11.1.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 01:35:28 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 4 Nils Philippsen 2011-07-06 08:19:37 UTC
Wrong component.

Comment 7 Ondrej Vasik 2011-07-15 04:56:48 UTC
Thanks for report, IMHO it is very cosmetic and almost harmless thing, though.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 12:23:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0778.html