| Summary: | [abrt] evolution-2.32.2-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeremy Mordkoff <jlm> | ||||
| Component: | evolution | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:edc30fef0fbbc1b63cbf4b3c1e5c92774b24fc0c | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-06-03 06:17:42 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jeremy Mordkoff
2011-06-02 20:06:06 UTC
Created attachment 502629 [details]
File: backtrace
Thanks for a bug report. I guess your folder.db file for the exchange account is corrupted after the crash, thus I suggest to remove whole local cache and let recreate it the next start. It's OK, because everything is stored on the server. The only disadvantage is that the remove messages will be redownloaded again. You can remove the local cache like this: a) close evolution b) make sure also e-addressbook-factory, e-calendar-factory and evolution-alarm-notify processes are not running c) move away folders: ~/.local/share/evolution/exchange ~/.local/share/evolution/mail/exchange d) run evolution Rather move those folders away, than delete them, in case something will break even more and you'll need to revert back. I found a similar bug already filled, thus I'm marking this one as its duplicate. Feel free to ask here if you'll have something unclear. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 661854 *** |